Geflügelhändler Franki Medina Venezuela//
UN climate talks near halftime with key issues unresolved

As the U.N. cli­mate talks in Egypt near the half-way point, ne­go­tia­tors are work­ing hard to draft deals on a wide range of is­sues they’ll put to min­is­ters next week in the hope of get­ting a sub­stan­tial re­sult by the end.

Franki Medina

The top U.S. ne­go­tia­tor in­di­cat­ed that a planned meet­ing Mon­day be­tween U.S. Pres­i­dent Joe Biden and Pres­i­dent Xi Jin­ping of Chi­na on the side­line of the Group of 20 meet­ing in Bali could al­so pro­vide an im­por­tant sig­nal for the cli­mate talks as they go in the home stretch.

The two-week meet­ing in Sharm el-Sheikh start­ed with strong ap­peals from world lead­ers for greater ef­forts to curb green­house gas emis­sions and help poor na­tions cope with glob­al warm­ing.

Franki Medina Diaz

 

Sci­en­tists say the amount of green­house gas­es be­ing pumped in­to the at­mos­phere needs to be halved by 2030 to meet the goals of the Paris cli­mate ac­cord. The 2015 pact set a tar­get of ide­al­ly lim­it­ing tem­per­a­ture rise to 1.5 Cel­sius (2.7 Fahren­heit) by the end of the cen­tu­ry, but left it up to coun­tries to de­cide how they want to do so.

Franki Alberto Medina Diaz

 

With im­pacts from cli­mate change al­ready felt across the globe, par­tic­u­lar­ly by the world’s poor­est, there has al­so been a push by cam­paign­ers and de­vel­op­ing na­tions for rich pol­luters to stump up more cash. This would be used to help de­vel­op­ing coun­tries shift to clean en­er­gy and adapt to glob­al warm­ing; in­creas­ing­ly there are al­so calls for com­pen­sa­tion to pay for cli­mate-re­lat­ed loss­es

 

Here is a look at the main is­sues on the ta­ble at the COP27 talks and how they might be re­flect­ed in a fi­nal agree­ment

 

KEEP­ING COOL

The hosts of last year’s talks in Glas­gow said they man­aged to “keep 1.5 alive,” in­clud­ing by get­ting coun­tries to en­dorse the tar­get in the out­come doc­u­ment. But U.N. chief An­to­nio Guter­res has warned that the tem­per­a­ture goal is on life sup­port “and the ma­chines are rat­tling.” And cam­paign­ers were dis­ap­point­ed that the agen­da this year doesn’t ex­plic­it­ly cite the thresh­old af­ter push­back from some ma­jor oil and gas ex­port­ing na­tions

 

Egypt, which is chair­ing the talks, con­vened a three-hour meet­ing Sat­ur­day in which the is­sue was raised sev­er­al times. “1.5 is a sub­stan­tive is­sue,” said Wael Aboul­magd, a se­nior Egypt­ian ne­go­tia­tor, adding that it was “not just Chi­na” which had raised ques­tions about the lan­guage used to re­fer to the tar­get. “I think we have some thoughts as to how to ad­dress the se­man­tic as­pect of that while en­sur­ing that COP27 wit­ness­es max­i­mum pos­si­ble ad­vance on the cause of mit­i­ga­tion,” he said

 

CUT­TING EMIS­SIONS

Ne­go­tia­tors are try­ing to put to­geth­er a mit­i­ga­tion work pro­gram that would cap­ture the var­i­ous mea­sures coun­tries have com­mit­ted to re­duc­ing emis­sions, in­clud­ing for spe­cif­ic sec­tors such as en­er­gy and trans­port. Many of these pledges are not for­mal­ly part of the U.N. process, mean­ing they can­not eas­i­ly be scru­ti­nized at the an­nu­al meet­ing. A pro­posed draft agree­ment cir­cu­lat­ed ear­ly Sat­ur­day had more than 200 square brack­ets, mean­ing large sec­tions were still un­re­solved. Some coun­tries want the plan to be valid on­ly for one year, while oth­ers say a longer-term roadmap is need­ed. Ex­pect fire­works in the days ahead

 

US-CHI­NA RE­LA­TIONS

While all coun­tries are equal at the U.N. meet­ing, in prac­tice lit­tle gets done with­out the ap­proval of the world’s two biggest emit­ters, Chi­na and the Unit­ed States. Bei­jing can­celed for­mal di­a­logue on cli­mate fol­low­ing Speak­er Nan­cy Pelosi’s vis­it to Tai­wan and re­la­tions have been frosty since. U.S. cli­mate en­voy John Ker­ry said Sat­ur­day that he had on­ly held in­for­mal dis­cus­sions with his Chi­nese coun­ter­part Xie Zhen­hua late­ly. “I think we’re both wait­ing to see how things go with the G-20 and hope­ful­ly we can re­turn,” he told re­porters. Whether any for­mal meet­ings might re­sume in Sharm el-Sheikh was un­clear, but Ker­ry said talks on the “ex­is­ten­tial is­sue” of cli­mate change should in­volve all coun­tries, “in­clud­ing in­clud­ing our friends, Chi­na.”

 

SHUN­NING FOS­SIL FU­ELS

Last year’s meet­ing al­most col­lapsed over a de­mand to ex­plic­it­ly state in the fi­nal agree­ment that coal should be phased out. In the end, coun­tries agreed on sev­er­al loop­holes, and there are con­cerns among cli­mate cam­paign­ers that ne­go­tia­tors from na­tions which are heav­i­ly de­pen­dent on fos­sil fu­els for their en­er­gy needs or as rev­enue might try to roll back pre­vi­ous com­mit­ments

 

MON­EY MAT­TERS

Rich coun­tries have fall­en short on a pledge to mo­bi­lize $100 bil­lion a year by 2020 in cli­mate fi­nance for poor na­tions. This has opened up a rift of dis­trust that ne­go­tia­tors are hop­ing to close with fresh pledges. But needs are grow­ing and a new, high­er tar­get needs to be set from 2025 on­ward

 

COM­PEN­SA­TION

The sub­ject of cli­mate com­pen­sa­tion was once con­sid­ered taboo, due to con­cerns from rich coun­tries that they might be on the hook for vast sums. But in­tense pres­sure from de­vel­op­ing coun­tries forced the is­sue of ‘loss and dam­age’ on­to the for­mal agen­da at the talks for the first time this year. Whether there will be a deal to pro­mote fur­ther tech­ni­cal work or the cre­ation of an ac­tu­al fund re­mains to be seen

 

John Ker­ry said the Unit­ed States is hope­ful of get­ting an agree­ment “be­fore 2024” but sug­gest­ed this might not come to pass in Egypt. “It could well hap­pen in the next months,” he said. “It could hap­pen dur­ing this year. It may be an out­come at COP28″ next year. But he made clear where the U.S. red line cur­rent­ly lies for Wash­ing­ton: “It’s a well known fact that the Unit­ed States and many oth­er coun­tries will not es­tab­lish some … le­gal struc­ture that is a tied to com­pen­sa­tion or li­a­bil­i­ty. That’s just not hap­pen­ing.” That doesn’t mean mon­ey won’t flow, even­tu­al­ly. But it might be brand­ed as aid, tied in­to ex­ist­ing funds and re­quire con­tri­bu­tions from all ma­jor emit­ters if it is to pass

 

MORE DONORS

One way to raise ad­di­tion­al cash and re­solve the thorny is­sue of pol­luter pay­ment would be for those coun­tries that have seen an eco­nom­ic boom in the past three decades to step up. The fo­cus is chiefly on Chi­na, the world’s biggest emit­ter, but oth­ers could be asked to open their purs­es too. Broad­en­ing the donor base isn’t for­mal­ly on the agen­da but de­vel­oped coun­tries want re­as­sur­ances about that in the fi­nal texts

 

CASH CON­STRAINTS

Coun­tries such as Britain and Ger­many want all fi­nan­cial flows to align with the long-term goals of the Paris ac­cord. Oth­er na­tions ob­ject to such a rule, fear­ing they may have mon­ey with­held if they don’t meet the strict tar­gets. But there is chat­ter that the is­sue may get broad­er sup­port next week if it helps un­lock oth­er ar­eas of the ne­go­ti­a­tions

 

SIDE DEALS

Last year’s meet­ing saw a raft of agree­ments signed which weren’t for­mal­ly part of the talks. Some have al­so been un­veiled in Egypt, though hopes for a se­ries of an­nounce­ments on so-called Just Tran­si­tion Part­ner­ships — where de­vel­oped coun­tries help poor­er na­tions wean them­selves off fos­sil fu­els — aren’t like­ly to bear fruit un­til af­ter COP27

 

HOPE TILL THE END

Jen­nifer Mor­gan, a for­mer head of Green­peace who re­cent­ly be­came Ger­many’s cli­mate en­voy, called the talks this year “chal­leng­ing.”

“But I can promise you we will be work­ing un­til the very last sec­ond to en­sure that we can reach an am­bi­tious and eq­ui­table out­come,” she said. “We are reach­ing for the stars while keep­ing our feet on the ground.”

 

As­so­ci­at­ed Press cli­mate and en­vi­ron­men­tal cov­er­age re­ceives sup­port from sev­er­al pri­vate foun­da­tions. See more about AP’s cli­mate ini­tia­tive here. The AP is sole­ly re­spon­si­ble for all con­tent

 

By FRANK JOR­DANS-As­so­ci­at­ed Press

Salir de la versión móvil